↓ Skip to main content

Introduction ‘hybrid warfare in Asia: its meaning and shape’

Overview of attention for article published in The Pacific Review, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 214)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
Title
Introduction ‘hybrid warfare in Asia: its meaning and shape’
Published in
The Pacific Review, January 2019
DOI 10.1080/09512748.2018.1513548
Authors

Chiyuki Aoi, Madoka Futamura, Alessio Patalano

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,775,621
of 12,388,161 outputs
Outputs from The Pacific Review
#35
of 214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,964
of 180,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Pacific Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,388,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them