↓ Skip to main content

Understanding desistance: a critical review of theories of desistance

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology, Crime & Law, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Understanding desistance: a critical review of theories of desistance
Published in
Psychology, Crime & Law, January 2019
DOI 10.1080/1068316x.2018.1560444
Authors

Beth Weaver

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 56%
Student > Master 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Unspecified 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 67%
Psychology 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,602,449
of 13,218,736 outputs
Outputs from Psychology, Crime & Law
#195
of 500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,323
of 324,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology, Crime & Law
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,218,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.