You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Blood loss of total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis: an analysis of influential factors
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, December 2018
Yong Hu, Qiang Li, Bao-Gang Wei, Xian-Sen Zhang, Tahsin Tarik Torsha, Jun Xiao, Zhan-Jun Shi
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||8||13%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||8||13%|
|Student > Bachelor||6||10%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||5||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||30||48%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||3||5%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
of 1,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 436,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.