↓ Skip to main content

Technological behavior of the early Late Pleistocene archaic humans at Lingjing (Xuchang, China)

Overview of attention for article published in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 247)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Technological behavior of the early Late Pleistocene archaic humans at Lingjing (Xuchang, China)
Published in
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12520-018-0759-7
Authors

Hao Li, Zhan-yang Li, Xing Gao, Kathleen Kuman, Alexandra Sumner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2019.
All research outputs
#798,900
of 12,388,161 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#32
of 247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,569
of 180,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,388,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.