↓ Skip to main content

The impact of repeated vaccination on influenza vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of repeated vaccination on influenza vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Medicine, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12916-018-1239-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren C. Ramsay, Sarah A. Buchan, Robert G. Stirling, Benjamin J. Cowling, Shuo Feng, Jeffrey C. Kwong, Bryna F. Warshawsky

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 125 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 34 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 42 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#337,645
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#278
of 4,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,459
of 449,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#4
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.