You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Optimal pressing strength and time for capillary refilling time
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2295-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rui Kawaguchi, Taka-aki Nakada, Taku Oshima, Masayoshi Shinozaki, Toshiya Nakaguchi, Hideaki Haneishi, Shigeto Oda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
Sweden | 1 | 8% |
Austria | 1 | 8% |
Chile | 1 | 8% |
Denmark | 1 | 8% |
Spain | 1 | 8% |
Colombia | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 3 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 25% |
Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 38% |
Engineering | 4 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,232,923
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,395
of 6,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,457
of 448,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#76
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.