↓ Skip to main content

Illness and disease: an empirical-ethical viewpoint

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Illness and disease: an empirical-ethical viewpoint
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12910-018-0341-y
Authors

Anna-Henrikje Seidlein, Sabine Salloch

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Other 8 29%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 43%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,333,680
of 14,122,258 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#299
of 616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,101
of 368,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#64
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,122,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.