You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Effects of the “War on Science” Frame on Scientists’ Credibility
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science Communication, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1177/1075547018822081 |
Authors |
Bruce W. Hardy, Meghnaa Tallapragada, John C. Besley, Shupei Yuan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 35 | 45% |
Canada | 4 | 5% |
Brazil | 2 | 3% |
South Africa | 2 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 27 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 44 | 56% |
Scientists | 30 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Researcher | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 22 | 32% |
Psychology | 8 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 22 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 239. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#160,518
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Science Communication
#9
of 584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,313
of 449,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Communication
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them