↓ Skip to main content

CMS data processing workflows during an extended cosmic ray run

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Instrumentation, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CMS data processing workflows during an extended cosmic ray run
Published in
Journal of Instrumentation, March 2010
DOI 10.1088/1748-0221/5/03/t03006
Authors

CMS Collaboration

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 201 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 70 34%
Professor 27 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 8%
Other 14 7%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 43 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 109 53%
Engineering 10 5%
Computer Science 10 5%
Materials Science 4 2%
Energy 4 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 52 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2020.
All research outputs
#9,671,952
of 17,946,015 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Instrumentation
#310
of 1,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,740
of 353,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Instrumentation
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,946,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,291 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.