You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CMS data processing workflows during an extended cosmic ray run
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Instrumentation, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-0221/5/03/t03006 |
| Authors |
CMS Collaboration |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Belgium | 1 | 20% |
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 216 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 73 | 33% |
| Professor | 29 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 50 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 113 | 51% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 5% |
| Engineering | 11 | 5% |
| Energy | 4 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 59 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,472,296
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Instrumentation
#272
of 1,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,397
of 94,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Instrumentation
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.