↓ Skip to main content

Bioelectrosynthesis

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 15: Mixed Culture Biocathodes for Production of Hydrogen, Methane, and Carboxylates
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 186)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Mixed Culture Biocathodes for Production of Hydrogen, Methane, and Carboxylates
Chapter number 15
Book title
Bioelectrosynthesis
Published in
Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/10_2017_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-003298-2, 978-3-03-003299-9
Authors

Annemiek ter Heijne, Florian Geppert, Tom H. J. A. Sleutels, Pau Batlle-Vilanova, Dandan Liu, Sebastià Puig

Abstract

Formation of hydrogen, methane, and organics at biocathodes is an attractive new application of bioelectrochemical systems (BESs). Using mixed cultures, these products can be formed at certain cathode potentials using specific operating conditions, of which pH is important. Thermodynamically, the reduction of CO2 to methane is the most favorable reaction, followed by reduction of CO2 to acetate and ethanol, and hydrogen. In practice, however, the cathode potential at which these reactions occur is more negative, meaning that more energy is required to drive the reaction. Therefore, hydrogen is often found as a second product or intermediate in the conversion of CO2 to both methane and carboxylates. In this chapter we summarize the inocula used for biocathode processes and discuss the achieved conversion rates and cathode potentials for formation of hydrogen, methane, and carboxylates. Although this overview reveals that BESs offer new opportunities for the bioproduction of different compounds, there are still challenges that need to be overcome before these systems can be applied on a larger scale. Graphical Abstract.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 30%
Researcher 6 22%
Other 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 15%
Chemical Engineering 3 11%
Engineering 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 10 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#1,826,784
of 12,088,915 outputs
Outputs from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#17
of 186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,721
of 284,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,088,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 186 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them