↓ Skip to main content

A lung cancer research agenda that reflects the diverse perspectives of community stakeholders: process and outcomes of the SEED method

Overview of attention for article published in Research Involvement and Engagement, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A lung cancer research agenda that reflects the diverse perspectives of community stakeholders: process and outcomes of the SEED method
Published in
Research Involvement and Engagement, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y
Authors

Carlin L. Rafie, Emily B. Zimmerman, Dawn E. Moser, Sarah Cook, Fatemeh Zarghami

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 4 29%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 36%
Social Sciences 2 14%
Psychology 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 2 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,578,622
of 14,137,193 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#147
of 166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,322
of 368,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#44
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,137,193 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.