↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for supporting parents’ decisions about autopsy after stillbirth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for supporting parents’ decisions about autopsy after stillbirth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009932.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dell Horey, Vicki Flenady, Alexander EP Heazell, Teck Yee Khong

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 19%
Student > Master 23 19%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Other 8 7%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 20%
Psychology 12 10%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 20 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,171,327
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,560
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,194
of 334,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.