↓ Skip to main content

Book Review: Alicia O’Cathain, A Practical Guide to using Qualitative Research with Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview of attention for article published in Qualitative Research, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Book Review: Alicia O’Cathain, A Practical Guide to using Qualitative Research with Randomized Controlled Trials
Published in
Qualitative Research, January 2019
DOI 10.1177/1468794118816626
Authors

Frances C. Sherratt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,767,032
of 14,503,973 outputs
Outputs from Qualitative Research
#86
of 462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,262
of 374,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Qualitative Research
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,503,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.