↓ Skip to main content

Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumours in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumours in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011668.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto Arezzo, Alberto Bullano, Giovanni Cochetti, Roberto Cirocchi, Justus Randolph, Ettore Mearini, Andrea Evangelista, Giovannino Ciccone, H. Jaap Bonjer, Mario Morino

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 17 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 21 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,854,572
of 14,130,850 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,176
of 10,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,134
of 368,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,130,850 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.