↓ Skip to main content

Flooding regimes increase avian predation on wildlife prey in tidal marsh ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology and Evolution, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flooding regimes increase avian predation on wildlife prey in tidal marsh ecosystems
Published in
Ecology and Evolution, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/ece3.4792
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen M. Thorne, Kyle A. Spragens, Kevin J. Buffington, Jordan A. Rosencranz, John Takekawa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 29%
Environmental Science 4 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,094,201
of 13,218,736 outputs
Outputs from Ecology and Evolution
#2,266
of 3,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,709
of 325,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology and Evolution
#153
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,218,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.