You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Fake News as Discursive Integration: An Analysis of Sites That Publish False, Misleading, Hyperpartisan and Sensational Information
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journalism Studies, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1080/1461670x.2019.1566871 |
Authors |
Rachel R. Mourão, Craig T. Robertson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 13 | 22% |
Spain | 6 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
Norway | 2 | 3% |
Brazil | 2 | 3% |
Chile | 2 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Israel | 1 | 2% |
Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 15% |
Unknown | 18 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 54% |
Scientists | 23 | 39% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 233 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 17% |
Student > Master | 29 | 12% |
Researcher | 18 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 6% |
Professor | 10 | 4% |
Other | 40 | 17% |
Unknown | 81 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 81 | 35% |
Computer Science | 20 | 9% |
Arts and Humanities | 17 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 2% |
Psychology | 4 | 2% |
Other | 21 | 9% |
Unknown | 86 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2021.
All research outputs
#764,301
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Journalism Studies
#53
of 1,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,490
of 449,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journalism Studies
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.