↓ Skip to main content

Regional income inequality in France 1860–1954: Methods and findings

Overview of attention for article published in Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Regional income inequality in France 1860–1954: Methods and findings
Published in
Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, January 2019
DOI 10.1080/01615440.2018.1541429
Authors

Alfonso Díez-Minguela, M. Teresa Sanchis Llopis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,773,467
of 13,226,211 outputs
Outputs from Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
#60
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,562
of 325,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,226,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.