↓ Skip to main content

How Australian wildlife spread and suppress Ross River virus

Overview of attention for news story in The Conversation
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
105 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Australian wildlife spread and suppress Ross River virus
Published by
The Conversation, January 2019
Authors

Cameron Webb, Eloise Stephenson, Emily Johnston Flies, Eloise Skinner

Abstract

Thousands of Australians contract Ross River virus each year. Mozzies can infect us with their bites, but only after they've bitten an infected animal host.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 105 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 152. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2021.
All research outputs
#152,733
of 17,721,313 outputs
Outputs from The Conversation
#18,962
of 125,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,321
of 396,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Conversation
#687
of 4,897 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,721,313 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 80.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,897 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.