↓ Skip to main content

Found childhood as a practice of child as method

Overview of attention for article published in Children's Geographies, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 301)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Found childhood as a practice of child as method
Published in
Children's Geographies, January 2019
DOI 10.1080/14733285.2019.1566518
Authors

Erica Burman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Lecturer 1 20%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 80%
Psychology 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,356,070
of 13,237,907 outputs
Outputs from Children's Geographies
#50
of 301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,470
of 375,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Children's Geographies
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,237,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.