The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development and validation of self-reported line drawings for assessment of knee malalignment and foot rotation: a cross-sectional comparative study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-10-57 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah L Ingham, Amanda Moody, Abhishek Abhishek, Sally A Doherty, Weiya Zhang, Michael Doherty |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 41 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
Researcher | 3 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 21% |
Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 45% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#17,785,991
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,680
of 2,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,906
of 94,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.