↓ Skip to main content

The Thucydides Trap and the Korean Peninsula: So why Won’t the USA and China Get Caught?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chinese Political Science, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 160)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Thucydides Trap and the Korean Peninsula: So why Won’t the USA and China Get Caught?
Published in
Journal of Chinese Political Science, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11366-018-09595-7
Authors

Zhaoying Han, Richard J. Cook, Maximilian Ohle

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 45%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 55%
Unspecified 3 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,862,010
of 13,604,798 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chinese Political Science
#42
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,724
of 293,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chinese Political Science
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,604,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.