You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The accuracy and stability of the maxillary position after orthognathic surgery using a novel computer-aided surgical simulation system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Oral Health, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12903-019-0711-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ju-Won Kim, Jong-Cheol Kim, Chun-Gi Jeong, Kyeong-Jun Cheon, Seoung-Won Cho, In-Young Park, Byoung-Eun Yang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 13% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 31 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 48% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2019.
All research outputs
#18,664,348
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#1,023
of 1,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#349,118
of 470,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#25
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.