↓ Skip to main content

Author Correction: Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

1 news outlet
6 tweeters

Readers on

11 Mendeley
Author Correction: Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences
Published in
Nature, January 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-0883-2
Pubmed ID

Serena Nik-Zainal, Helen Davies, Johan Staaf, Manasa Ramakrishna, Dominik Glodzik, Xueqing Zou, Inigo Martincorena, Ludmil B. Alexandrov, Sancha Martin, David C. Wedge, Peter Van Loo, Young Seok Ju, Marcel Smid, Arie B. Brinkman, Sandro Morganella, Miriam R. Aure, Ole Christian Lingjærde, Anita Langerød, Markus Ringnér, Sung-Min Ahn, Sandrine Boyault, Jane E. Brock, Annegien Broeks, Adam Butler, Christine Desmedt, Luc Dirix, Serge Dronov, Aquila Fatima, John A. Foekens, Moritz Gerstung, Gerrit K. J. Hooijer, Se Jin Jang, David R. Jones, Hyung-Yong Kim, Tari A. King, Savitri Krishnamurthy, Hee Jin Lee, Jeong-Yeon Lee, Yilong Li, Stuart McLaren, Andrew Menzies, Ville Mustonen, Sarah O’Meara, Iris Pauporté, Xavier Pivot, Colin A. Purdie, Keiran Raine, Kamna Ramakrishnan, F. Germán Rodríguez-González, Gilles Romieu, Anieta M. Sieuwerts, Peter T. Simpson, Rebecca Shepherd, Lucy Stebbings, Olafur A. Stefansson, Jon Teague, Stefania Tommasi, Isabelle Treilleux, Gert G. Van den Eynden, Peter Vermeulen, Anne Vincent-Salomon, Lucy Yates, Carlos Caldas, Laura van’t Veer, Andrew Tutt, Stian Knappskog, Benita Kiat Tee Tan, Jos Jonkers, Åke Borg, Naoto T. Ueno, Christos Sotiriou, Alain Viari, P. Andrew Futreal, Peter J. Campbell, Paul N. Span, Steven Van Laere, Sunil R. Lakhani, Jorunn E. Eyfjord, Alastair M. Thompson, Ewan Birney, Hendrik G. Stunnenberg, Marc J. van de Vijver, John W. M. Martens, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale, Andrea L. Richardson, Gu Kong, Gilles Thomas, Michael R. Stratton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Philosophy 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2019.
All research outputs
of 15,025,082 outputs
Outputs from Nature
of 73,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 328,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
of 920 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,025,082 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 73,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 82.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 920 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.