↓ Skip to main content

Author Correction: Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Author Correction: Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences
Published in
Nature, January 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-0883-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Serena Nik-Zainal, Helen Davies, Johan Staaf, Manasa Ramakrishna, Dominik Glodzik, Xueqing Zou, Inigo Martincorena, Ludmil B. Alexandrov, Sancha Martin, David C. Wedge, Peter Van Loo, Young Seok Ju, Marcel Smid, Arie B. Brinkman, Sandro Morganella, Miriam R. Aure, Ole Christian Lingjærde, Anita Langerød, Markus Ringnér, Sung-Min Ahn, Sandrine Boyault, Jane E. Brock, Annegien Broeks, Adam Butler, Christine Desmedt, Luc Dirix, Serge Dronov, Aquila Fatima, John A. Foekens, Moritz Gerstung, Gerrit K. J. Hooijer, Se Jin Jang, David R. Jones, Hyung-Yong Kim, Tari A. King, Savitri Krishnamurthy, Hee Jin Lee, Jeong-Yeon Lee, Yilong Li, Stuart McLaren, Andrew Menzies, Ville Mustonen, Sarah O’Meara, Iris Pauporté, Xavier Pivot, Colin A. Purdie, Keiran Raine, Kamna Ramakrishnan, F. Germán Rodríguez-González, Gilles Romieu, Anieta M. Sieuwerts, Peter T. Simpson, Rebecca Shepherd, Lucy Stebbings, Olafur A. Stefansson, Jon Teague, Stefania Tommasi, Isabelle Treilleux, Gert G. Van den Eynden, Peter Vermeulen, Anne Vincent-Salomon, Lucy Yates, Carlos Caldas, Laura van’t Veer, Andrew Tutt, Stian Knappskog, Benita Kiat Tee Tan, Jos Jonkers, Åke Borg, Naoto T. Ueno, Christos Sotiriou, Alain Viari, P. Andrew Futreal, Peter J. Campbell, Paul N. Span, Steven Van Laere, Sunil R. Lakhani, Jorunn E. Eyfjord, Alastair M. Thompson, Ewan Birney, Hendrik G. Stunnenberg, Marc J. van de Vijver, John W. M. Martens, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale, Andrea L. Richardson, Gu Kong, Gilles Thomas, Michael R. Stratton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Unspecified 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 21%
Unspecified 4 17%
Mathematics 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 2 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,263,866
of 13,825,270 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#31,697
of 70,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,221
of 307,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#818
of 919 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,825,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 919 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.