You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Perspective on the response of marine calcifiers to global warming and ocean acidification—Behavior of corals and foraminifera in a high CO2 world “hot house”
|
---|---|
Published in |
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40645-018-0239-9 |
Authors |
Hodaka Kawahata, Kazuhiko Fujita, Akira Iguchi, Mayuri Inoue, Shinya Iwasaki, Azumi Kuroyanagi, Ayumi Maeda, Takuya Manaka, Kazuyoshi Moriya, Haruka Takagi, Takashi Toyofuku, Toshihiro Yoshimura, Atsushi Suzuki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 3 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 252 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 44 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 29 | 12% |
Student > Master | 27 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
Other | 27 | 11% |
Unknown | 77 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 69 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 24 | 10% |
Chemistry | 8 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
Other | 26 | 10% |
Unknown | 86 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,087,319
of 25,124,631 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#32
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,899
of 449,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,124,631 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.