You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Student attitudes toward cadaveric dissection at a UK medical school
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Anatomical Sciences Education, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ase.237 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thelma A. Quince, Stephen I. G. Barclay, Michelle Spear, Richard A. Parker, Diana F. Wood |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 24% |
| Unknown | 19 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Psychology | 7 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2021.
All research outputs
#729,240
of 24,629,540 outputs
Outputs from Anatomical Sciences Education
#16
of 708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,543
of 116,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anatomical Sciences Education
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,629,540 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them