↓ Skip to main content

A comparative review and framework development on public participation for decision-making in Chinese public projects

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Impact Assessment Review, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparative review and framework development on public participation for decision-making in Chinese public projects
Published in
Environmental Impact Assessment Review, March 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2018.12.006
Authors

Yijun Zhou, Lei Hou, Yu Yang, Heap-Yih Chong, Sungkon Moon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 13 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Lecturer 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 13 29%
Environmental Science 6 13%
Engineering 5 11%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,220,432
of 14,167,291 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Impact Assessment Review
#256
of 374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,027
of 319,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Impact Assessment Review
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,167,291 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.