You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Defective Epstein–Barr virus in chronic active infection and haematological malignancy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Microbiology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41564-018-0334-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yusuke Okuno, Takayuki Murata, Yoshitaka Sato, Hideki Muramatsu, Yoshinori Ito, Takahiro Watanabe, Tatsuya Okuno, Norihiro Murakami, Kenichi Yoshida, Akihisa Sawada, Masami Inoue, Keisei Kawa, Masao Seto, Koichi Ohshima, Yuichi Shiraishi, Kenichi Chiba, Hiroko Tanaka, Satoru Miyano, Yohei Narita, Masahiro Yoshida, Fumi Goshima, Jun-ichi Kawada, Tetsuya Nishida, Hitoshi Kiyoi, Seiichi Kato, Shigeo Nakamura, Satoko Morishima, Tetsushi Yoshikawa, Shigeyoshi Fujiwara, Norio Shimizu, Yasushi Isobe, Masaaki Noguchi, Atsushi Kikuta, Keiji Iwatsuki, Yoshiyuki Takahashi, Seiji Kojima, Seishi Ogawa, Hiroshi Kimura |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Russia | 1 | 4% |
| Israel | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 71% |
| Scientists | 7 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 19% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 32 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 19% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 39 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,872,355
of 25,916,093 outputs
Outputs from Nature Microbiology
#1,555
of 2,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,522
of 449,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Microbiology
#57
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,916,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 95.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.