You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Anti-LRP5/6 VHHs promote differentiation of Wnt-hypersensitive intestinal stem cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41467-018-08172-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nicola Fenderico, Revina C. van Scherpenzeel, Michael Goldflam, Davide Proverbio, Ingrid Jordens, Tomica Kralj, Sarah Stryeck, Tarek Z. Bass, Guy Hermans, Christopher Ullman, Teodor Aastrup, Piet Gros, Madelon M. Maurice |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 6 | 26% |
United States | 5 | 22% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Finland | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Russia | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 52% |
Scientists | 8 | 35% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 24% |
Researcher | 13 | 12% |
Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 16% |
Unknown | 29 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 34% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 9% |
Unknown | 32 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,846,260
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#23,374
of 49,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,457
of 440,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#641
of 1,264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.