↓ Skip to main content

The persistence of carbon in the African forest understory

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Plants, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
74 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The persistence of carbon in the African forest understory
Published in
Nature Plants, January 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41477-018-0316-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wannes Hubau, Tom De Mil, Jan Van den Bulcke, Oliver L. Phillips, Bhély Angoboy Ilondea, Joris Van Acker, Martin J. P. Sullivan, Laurent Nsenga, Benjamin Toirambe, Camille Couralet, Lindsay F. Banin, Serge K. Begne, Timothy R. Baker, Nils Bourland, Eric Chezeaux, Connie J. Clark, Murray Collins, James A. Comiskey, Aida Cuni-Sanchez, Victor Deklerck, Sofie Dierickx, Jean-Louis Doucet, Corneille E. N. Ewango, Ted R. Feldpausch, Martin Gilpin, Christelle Gonmadje, Jefferson S. Hall, David J. Harris, Olivier J. Hardy, Marie-Noel D. Kamdem, Emmanuel Kasongo Yakusu, Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez, Jean-Remy Makana, Yadvinder Malhi, Faustin M. Mbayu, Sam Moore, Jacques Mukinzi, Georgia Pickavance, John R. Poulsen, Jan Reitsma, Mélissa Rousseau, Bonaventure Sonké, Terry Sunderland, Hermann Taedoumg, Joey Talbot, John Tshibamba Mukendi, Peter M. Umunay, Jason Vleminckx, Lee J. T. White, Lise Zemagho, Simon L. Lewis, Hans Beeckman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 43%
Environmental Science 20 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 10%
Psychology 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 13 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2020.
All research outputs
#296,849
of 15,917,147 outputs
Outputs from Nature Plants
#190
of 1,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,786
of 337,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Plants
#6
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,917,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.