↓ Skip to main content

Cooking with Controversies: How Geographers Might Use Controversy Mapping as a Research Tool

Overview of attention for article published in The Professional Geographer, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Cooking with Controversies: How Geographers Might Use Controversy Mapping as a Research Tool
Published in
The Professional Geographer, January 2019
DOI 10.1080/00330124.2018.1531243
Authors

Josh Lepawsky, John-Michael Davis, Grace Akese, Donny Persaud

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 100%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 100%
Social Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,249,224
of 13,210,683 outputs
Outputs from The Professional Geographer
#66
of 424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,411
of 278,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Professional Geographer
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,210,683 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.