↓ Skip to main content

Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating fractures of the middle third of the clavicle

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating fractures of the middle third of the clavicle
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009363.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mário Lenza, Rachelle Buchbinder, Renea V Johnston, Bruno AS Ferrari, Flávio Faloppa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 179 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 22%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Unspecified 19 10%
Other 19 10%
Researcher 19 10%
Other 66 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 56%
Unspecified 35 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Psychology 6 3%
Other 19 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,910,579
of 13,472,087 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,582
of 10,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,464
of 289,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,472,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.