↓ Skip to main content

Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating fractures of the middle third of the clavicle

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating fractures of the middle third of the clavicle
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009363.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mário Lenza, Rachelle Buchbinder, Renea V Johnston, Bruno AS Ferrari, Flávio Faloppa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 184 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 18%
Student > Bachelor 27 14%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Postgraduate 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Other 40 21%
Unknown 36 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 12%
Psychology 5 3%
Engineering 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 49 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,512,482
of 15,728,426 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,940
of 11,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,299
of 335,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,728,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.