↓ Skip to main content

Using family history information to promote healthy lifestyles and prevent diseases; a discussion of the evidence

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using family history information to promote healthy lifestyles and prevent diseases; a discussion of the evidence
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-248
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liesbeth Claassen, Lidewij Henneman, A Cecile JW Janssens, Miranda Wijdenes-Pijl, Nadeem Qureshi, Fiona M Walter, Paula W Yoon, Danielle RM Timmermans

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 2%
Sri Lanka 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 89 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 23%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Computer Science 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 10 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,762,068
of 12,372,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,316
of 8,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,014
of 336,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.