You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-fidelity is not superior to low-fidelity simulation but leads to overconfidence in medical students
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12909-019-1464-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christina Massoth, Hannah Röder, Hendrik Ohlenburg, Michael Hessler, Alexander Zarbock, Daniel M. Pöpping, Manuel Wenk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 18% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 41% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 35% |
| Scientists | 4 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 383 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 383 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 10% |
| Researcher | 30 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 69 | 18% |
| Unknown | 174 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 4% |
| Engineering | 10 | 3% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 8% |
| Unknown | 184 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,086,315
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#499
of 4,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,849
of 448,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#22
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.