↓ Skip to main content

Endometrial resection and ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endometrial resection and ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001501.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez, Anne Lethaby, Mihaela Grigore, Julie Brown, Martha Hickey, Cindy Farquhar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 135 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Unspecified 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Researcher 14 10%
Other 36 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 41%
Unspecified 21 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 12%
Psychology 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Other 24 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,476,362
of 12,668,609 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,180
of 10,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,269
of 229,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,668,609 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.