You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Impaired Wound Healing of Alveolar Lung Epithelial Cells in a Breathing Lung-On-A-Chip
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, January 2019
Marcel Felder, Bettina Trueeb, Andreas Oliver Stucki, Sarah Borcard, Janick Daniel Stucki, Bruno Schnyder, Thomas Geiser, Olivier Thierry Guenat
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||5||83%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||35||20%|
|Student > Master||26||15%|
|Student > Bachelor||20||12%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||11||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||33||19%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||9||5%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||7||4%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||6||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2021.
All research outputs
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
of 6,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 437,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,807 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.