↓ Skip to main content

Schedules for Self-monitoring Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Hypertension (Science Direct), January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Schedules for Self-monitoring Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review
Published in
American Journal of Hypertension (Science Direct), January 2019
DOI 10.1093/ajh/hpy185
Pubmed ID
Authors

James A Hodgkinson, Richard Stevens, Sabrina Grant, Jonathan Mant, Emma P Bray, F D Richard Hobbs, Una Martin, Claire Schwartz, David McCartney, Rachel O’Mahony, Rafael Perera-Salazar, Nia Roberts, Sarah Stevens, Bryan Williams, Richard J McManus

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 36%
Professor 3 21%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 36%
Computer Science 4 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#864,989
of 13,532,333 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Hypertension (Science Direct)
#73
of 1,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,061
of 292,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Hypertension (Science Direct)
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,532,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.