You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Two-Year Survival Comparing Web-Based Symptom Monitoring vs Routine Surveillance Following Treatment for Lung Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2018.18085 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fabrice Denis, Ethan Basch, Anne-Lise Septans, Jaafar Bennouna, Thierry Urban, Amylou C. Dueck, Christophe Letellier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 207 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 70 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 7% |
| Australia | 10 | 5% |
| Sweden | 10 | 5% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Spain | 5 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Japan | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 68 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 118 | 57% |
| Scientists | 54 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 30 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 164 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 56 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 61 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 157. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#267,674
of 25,918,061 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#3,434
of 36,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,774
of 449,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#81
of 368 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 368 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.