You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Skewed contributions of individual trees to indirect nature experiences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landscape & Urban Planning, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.01.008 |
| Authors |
Daniel T.C. Cox, Jonathan Bennie, Stefano Casalegno, Hannah L. Hudson, Karen Anderson, Kevin J. Gaston |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 121 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 39 | 32% |
| Canada | 9 | 7% |
| United States | 8 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 4 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Antarctica | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 90 | 74% |
| Scientists | 28 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 36 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 24 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Design | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 43 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2020.
All research outputs
#489,797
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Landscape & Urban Planning
#66
of 2,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,807
of 363,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape & Urban Planning
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.