↓ Skip to main content

Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
133 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007798.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joan Webster, Sonya Osborne, Claire M Rickard, Nicole Marsh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 133 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 133 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 25%
Student > Master 17 13%
Researcher 13 10%
Other 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 48 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Design 2 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 29 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#217,001
of 15,384,893 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#463
of 11,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,602
of 332,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,384,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.