↓ Skip to main content

TearCare® system extension study: evaluation of the safety, effectiveness, and durability through 12 months of a second TearCare® treatment on subjects with dry eye disease

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 2,260)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
<p>TearCare<sup>&reg;</sup> system extension study: evaluation of the safety, effectiveness, and durability through 12 months of a second TearCare<sup>&reg;</sup> treatment on subjects with dry eye disease</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2019
DOI 10.2147/opth.s191588
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Badawi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Psychology 1 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2019.
All research outputs
#494,654
of 18,829,177 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#23
of 2,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,050
of 352,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,829,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,260 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them