You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multispectral imaging for presymptomatic analysis of light leaf spot in oilseed rape
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-019-0389-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles Veys, Fokion Chatziavgerinos, Ali AlSuwaidi, James Hibbert, Mark Hansen, Gytis Bernotas, Melvyn Smith, Hujun Yin, Stephen Rolfe, Bruce Grieve |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 37% |
| Engineering | 10 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,473,633
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#407
of 1,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,612
of 436,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#17
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.