↓ Skip to main content

The Indian legends on Atavaka, the demon wordering through the wilderness, and the Japanese Imperial cult of the Tai Yuan Shuai Robert Duquenne, Collaborator to “Hobogirin, Dictionnaire Encyclopédique…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu), January 1975
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Indian legends on Atavaka, the demon wordering through the wilderness, and the Japanese Imperial cult of the Tai Yuan Shuai Robert Duquenne, Collaborator to “Hobogirin, Dictionnaire Encyclopédique du Bouddhisme”
Published in
Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu), January 1975
DOI 10.4259/ibk.23.701
Authors

Robert Duquenne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2019.
All research outputs
#16,580,596
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu)
#368
of 620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,683
of 20,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu)
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 620 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.