↓ Skip to main content

IMPaCT Back study protocol. Implementation of subgrouping for targeted treatment systems for low back pain patients in primary care: a prospective population-based sequential comparison

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
IMPaCT Back study protocol. Implementation of subgrouping for targeted treatment systems for low back pain patients in primary care: a prospective population-based sequential comparison
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-11-186
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadine E Foster, Ricky Mullis, Julie Young, Carol Doyle, Martyn Lewis, David Whitehurst, Elaine M Hay

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 156 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 16%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 41 25%
Unknown 14 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 14%
Psychology 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 4%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 27 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2015.
All research outputs
#3,577,663
of 12,373,620 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#863
of 2,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,736
of 336,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,620 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them