↓ Skip to main content

Research approvals iceberg: how a ‘low-key’ study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 670)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
48 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Research approvals iceberg: how a ‘low-key’ study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12910-018-0339-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mila Petrova, Stephen Barclay

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Other 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Psychology 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 9 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#340,316
of 15,251,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#22
of 670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,784
of 330,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,251,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them