↓ Skip to main content

Cluster‐based permutation tests of MEG/EEG data do not establish significance of effect latency or location

Overview of attention for article published in Psychophysiology, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
83 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
401 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
520 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cluster‐based permutation tests of MEG/EEG data do not establish significance of effect latency or location
Published in
Psychophysiology, January 2019
DOI 10.1111/psyp.13335
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jona Sassenhagen, Dejan Draschkow

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 520 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 520 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 140 27%
Researcher 74 14%
Student > Master 71 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 7%
Student > Bachelor 37 7%
Other 65 13%
Unknown 96 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 143 28%
Psychology 114 22%
Engineering 24 5%
Linguistics 21 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 2%
Other 52 10%
Unknown 154 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2020.
All research outputs
#904,965
of 26,737,936 outputs
Outputs from Psychophysiology
#90
of 2,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,118
of 452,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychophysiology
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,737,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.