↓ Skip to main content

A retrospective international study on factors associated with injury, discomfort and pain perception among cyclists

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A retrospective international study on factors associated with injury, discomfort and pain perception among cyclists
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0211197
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose Ignacio Priego Quesada, Zachary Y. Kerr, William M. Bertucci, Felipe P. Carpes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 25 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 16 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Unspecified 5 6%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 29 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,666,099
of 17,371,891 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#34,242
of 164,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,270
of 344,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#65
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,371,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 164,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.