You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A retrospective international study on factors associated with injury, discomfort and pain perception among cyclists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0211197 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jose Ignacio Priego Quesada, Zachary Y. Kerr, William M. Bertucci, Felipe P. Carpes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 17% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Portugal | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 164 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
| Researcher | 9 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 71 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 26 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 11% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 82 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,990,557
of 24,066,486 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#49,371
of 206,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,066
of 444,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#849
of 3,082 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,066,486 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,082 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.