| Title |
The Global Syndemic of Obesity, Undernutrition, and Climate Change: The Lancet Commission report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32822-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Boyd A Swinburn, Vivica I Kraak, Steven Allender, Vincent J Atkins, Phillip I Baker, Jessica R Bogard, Hannah Brinsden, Alejandro Calvillo, Olivier De Schutter, Raji Devarajan, Majid Ezzati, Sharon Friel, Shifalika Goenka, Ross A Hammond, Gerard Hastings, Corinna Hawkes, Mario Herrero, Peter S Hovmand, Mark Howden, Lindsay M Jaacks, Ariadne B Kapetanaki, Matt Kasman, Harriet V Kuhnlein, Shiriki K Kumanyika, Bagher Larijani, Tim Lobstein, Michael W Long, Victor K R Matsudo, Susanna D H Mills, Gareth Morgan, Alexandra Morshed, Patricia M Nece, An Pan, David W Patterson, Gary Sacks, Meera Shekar, Geoff L Simmons, Warren Smit, Ali Tootee, Stefanie Vandevijvere, Wilma E Waterlander, Luke Wolfenden, William H Dietz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,343 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 270 | 12% |
| United States | 260 | 11% |
| Spain | 134 | 6% |
| Australia | 120 | 5% |
| Mexico | 77 | 3% |
| Canada | 57 | 2% |
| Chile | 43 | 2% |
| France | 32 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 31 | 1% |
| Other | 463 | 20% |
| Unknown | 856 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1575 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 366 | 16% |
| Scientists | 339 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 60 | 3% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,935 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2935 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 393 | 13% |
| Researcher | 341 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 274 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 246 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 145 | 5% |
| Other | 465 | 16% |
| Unknown | 1071 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 373 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 367 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 211 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 201 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 92 | 3% |
| Other | 504 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1187 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3082. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,116
of 25,830,657 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#117
of 43,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24
of 449,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#3
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.