You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, May 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nrn1390 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martha J. Farah, Judy Illes, Robert Cook-Deegan, Howard Gardner, Eric Kandel, Patricia King, Eric Parens, Barbara Sahakian, Paul Root Wolpe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 675 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 2% |
| Germany | 10 | 1% |
| Italy | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | 3% |
| Unknown | 600 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 116 | 17% |
| Researcher | 114 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 110 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 80 | 12% |
| Professor | 51 | 8% |
| Other | 149 | 22% |
| Unknown | 55 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 186 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 84 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 55 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 52 | 8% |
| Other | 145 | 21% |
| Unknown | 82 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,001,491
of 24,739,153 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#489
of 2,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,081
of 62,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,739,153 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.