| Title |
The molecular evolution of feathers with direct evidence from fossils
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1815703116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yanhong Pan, Wenxia Zheng, Roger H Sawyer, Michael W Pennington, Xiaoting Zheng, Xiaoli Wang, Min Wang, Liang Hu, Jingmai O'Connor, Tao Zhao, Zhiheng Li, Elena R Schroeter, Feixiang Wu, Xing Xu, Zhonghe Zhou, Mary H Schweitzer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 13% |
| Japan | 7 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Thailand | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 41 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 83% |
| Scientists | 10 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 32% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 24 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 32 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 263. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2023.
All research outputs
#141,788
of 25,816,430 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#2,879
of 103,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,890
of 449,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#61
of 992 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,816,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 992 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.