You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
En quin grau afecten les pseudociències a la comunitat educativa?
Mètode Science Studies Journal: Annual Review, March 2018
Jordi Solbes Matarredona, Rafael Palomar Fons, María Consuelo Domínguez Sales
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||33%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||33%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||4||16%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||8%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||8%|
|Student > Master||2||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||8%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||4%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,211,034 outputs
Outputs from Mètode Science Studies Journal: Annual Review
of 180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 336,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mètode Science Studies Journal: Annual Review
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,211,034 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 180 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.